Essentials > How To Choose The Safest Motorcycle Helmet

How To Choose The Safest Motorcycle Helmet

Arai corsair helmet

In a crash, the right helmet can mean the difference between living and dying.

I am frequently asked to make a recommendation for the best motorcycle helmets.  As a motorcycle journalist, and a practicing attorney handling head injury and occasional defective helmet cases, I have many years of personal experience with helmet use, and vicarious experience with helmet performance in actual accidents.

Choosing a helmet always seems to start with the question of whether a helmet should be a half, three-quarters or full face helmet.  Are you kidding?  Unless you are highway patrol with a need that interferes with the choice of a full face helmet, this is a non-decision.  I belong to an internet motorcycle list, one of whose members suffered what should have been a very minor injury crash.  Because the helmet was a convertible style, the chin protection flipped up, and the rider suffered an injury to the mouth and jaw.  Result?  Death.  If you are even considering anything other than a full face helmet, do a little bit of research on the internet about facial injuries suffered in motorcycle accidents.  Are you really willing to risk hitting your teeth on a curb?

The United States utilizes two standard rating systems to help you distinguish between helmet specifications, the DOT (Department of Transportation) standard, and the Snell standard (private firm).  The Snell standard is a much tougher standard and involves a standard impact replication test with two strikes to the exact same spot. It measures the effect on the EPS liner, and determines if the helmet passes. Both of these standards are limited, because it is impossible to duplicate how a helmet functions in the real world. The DOT standard is a set of guidelines required of all helmet manufacturers for a helmet to be legal.

Many top experts in the motorcycle helmet field are highly critical of the Snell standard, because it causes helmets to be too rigid.  They point out in particular that the ability to withstand two hits in the same place has nothing whatever to do with real world crashes.  By making the helmet too rigid, instead of softer, many preventable head injuries occur in more common lower impact accidents.  Some experts seriously recommend not purchasing a Snell certified helmet, particularly since Snell upped it standard a few years back.  I discussed this at length with an MD who rides motorcycles, and his response was to purchase a European helmet, because it was softer.  Given that this issue is so well known, it seems reasonable to expect change in the not too distant future.

As a solution, I recommend looking into European manufacturers. There is a major difference between the European and US approach to helmet design, directly related to the hardness and softness of various helmet components.  In some impacts, a harder material provides better protection; in others a softer material provides better protection.  In gross terms, the softer material is better for greater impact protection, while the harder material works better in more common, but lesser impacts.

Current helmet technology involves an inner liner to absorb shock, made of EPS foam, similar to a harder version of Styrofoam.  There is a comfort liner that riders often mistake for a protective component, which normally also provides some padding.  A proper helmet should also have EPS foam in the lower area if it is to properly protect the face and jaw.

Even the safest helmets have some technological limitations. First, many head injuries result from rotation.  The brain floats in fluid inside the skull.  If the head is snapped in rotation, the motion can induce tearing of the brain, even if the skull and outer layer of skin remains in perfect condition.  Similarly, the brain can be slammed back and forth in the skull, resulting in injury against the rough contours of the inside of the skull.  At least one company is marketing a helmet that has a loose moveable outer membrane, with the claim that it can reduce rotational brain injuries by 65%.  To date, I have been unsuccessful in purchasing a full face model of this helmet for shipping to the United States.

A second limitation is that the EPS foam only absorbs force in direct relationship to its thickness.  A significant blow will overwhelm the foam.  Several companies have begun to experiment with “non-Newtonian” materials.  These materials are made up of polymers with long molecules.  Like too many big rigs trying to exit the city, in response to a hard force, the polymer molecules lock, causing the material to become inflexible, and spread force over its entirety.  These materials are lighter in weight for a given level of protection, of softer consistency, and mold to your contours when warm so they fit better.  Further, some forms of them are liquid, which could be particularly beneficial if a liquid layer could be incorporated in a helmet, which would lock molecules on contact.  The downside of these materials will be cost, and the fact that they degrade over 2-3 years.

Fit is essential to finding the best helmet for you.  What needs to fit is the EPS liner, not the comfort liner.  Heads are different not only in size, but in shape.  A rough measurement should be taken from above the eyebrows, around the head at the furthest point of the back of the head, and around.  A helmet must always be tried on, and checked for fit.  The chin strap should be tightened so that only two fingers will fit between the strap and the head.  There should be no gaps at the top, front, back, or side of the head, although it should not be painfully tight.  The helmet should be worn for a few minutes to gauge the fit.  If you attempt to rotate the helmet, your cheeks should move.  If the helmet moves or slips with rotation, or up and down, it is not a good fit.  To test the chin strap, look down toward your chest, and see if the back of the helmet can be pushed upward.

Keep in mind that there are non-safety factors that make a big difference.  These include the feel of the safety liner, the amount of air flow, and the size and shape of the eye opening.  Sound level is somewhat of a safety consideration, because it affects what is heard, and because wind noise over time will damage your hearing.  Weight is more a comfort factor than a safety factor, but in an accident, the physics of weight may make a difference

At the end of the day, the most important thing is that the helmet fits your head correctly, and that the chin strap holds it on your head.

If you want some direct recommendations, here are my top picks:

Top 11 Safest Motorcycle Helmets

1. Arai Corsair V

The structural integrity of the Corsair V is Snell approved and reinforced by its peripheral belting which extends across the forehead. This feature does not increase the size of the shell and maintains flexibility while still remaining light weight. This means that the force from impacts will be distributed more evenly causing less injury. The Corsair also features an Emergency Release Tab for cheek pads creating access for medical technicians in the event of an accident. The cost for this helmet comes close to $1,000.




2. Shoei X-12

Shoei X-12The Shoei X-12’s shell is both DOT and Snell approved. The construction technology used by this company to produce the shell combines fibers to create material for the shell. It requires a laser to cut and evenly distributes force from impacts. The Shoei X-12 features the Emergency Quick Release System for cheek pads. In the event that the helmet must be removed by medical personnel, the process is rapid while eliminating as much further injury as possible to the rider. The Shoei X-12 helmet pricing begins just after $600. Photo: YlwDevil



3. HJC CL-16


The HJC CL-16 provides high standard DOT and Snell approved safety features. The shell is lightweight and has been fabricated with Computer Aided Design technology.

It requires no tools for quick shield installation and removal with a RapidFire Shield Replacement System.

The superior quality face shield offers 95% protection from UV rays.

This helmet does not offer all of the safety features of others; however, it does fall at the lower end of the pricing spectrum hovering between $70 and $100.

Photo: Revzilla

4. Scorpion EXO-R2000

Scorpion EXO-R2000The Scorpion EXO-R2000 features a TCT Composite Shell and is Snell certified. It is designed from five layers which consist of Aramid, fiberglass, and poly resin fibers that are organic. This helmet includes the cheek pad Emergency Release System for quick and simple removal during traumatic situations.

The state of the art EverClear face shield is fog free. It features inflatable AirFit cheek pads for an optimal fit and added protection. The Scorpion EXO-2000 provides many of the same technologically advanced safety features as other, more expensive helmets, while falling just below the $400 price mark.

Photo: Scorpion

5. Arai RX-Q

Arai RX-Q

The Arai RX-Q offers a face shield similar to that of the manufacturer’s Corsair model. The new cheek pads feature the Emergency Release System which allows medical technicians expedient and simple access in the event of a crash. The Arai Company states that fiberglass is the most suitable material for constructing helmet shells and use it to build each of these helmets by hand. The Arai RX-Q exceeds or meets safety standards of both the DOT and Snell M2010. This helmet can be found for between $500 and $550.



6. Bell Star

Bell StarIt has received both a DOT and Snell M2010 certification. Bell Star helmets can be found on the market for around $350.Bell Star helmets are designed with a TriMatrix composite consisting of extremely lightweight Kevlar, fiberglass, and carbon fiber. Kevlar is especially created to and used for impact distribution and absorption. The 3Mode, ClickRelease face shield features an anti-fog coating.

Photo: Hien Tran



7. Bell RS-1

Bell RS1

The Bell RS-1 is designed from a fiberglass/Kevlar shell making it very durable. This combination creates a light weight composite which does not interfere with maneuverability. Kevlar first effectively absorbs the force from impact then distributes it evenly greatly reducing injuries.

This helmet is Snell M2010 certified. It features a quick, Click Release face shield which is treated with an anti-fog coating. The Bell RS-1 can be purchased for just under $400.

Photo: Megat DS



8. Shoei RF-1200

Shoei RF 1200The Shoei RF-1200 liner features a double layer possessing two different impact density levels. It is also designed with a wide base for quick, easy removal. It has been constructed with a Quick Release Self-Adjusting face shield base plate which is spring loaded. Both the Quick Emergency Release shield and wider base provides simple accessibility to medical technicians in the event of an accident. It is priced between $420 and $450.

Photo: SF Moto


9. Shark Evoline

Shark EvolineThe Shark Evoline has been designed with a Lexan Polycarbonate shell which effectively provides high impact protection. The helmet is DOT and ECE 2205 approved. The chinbar Auto-Up System offers easy manipulation and is ECE 2205 certified in the closed and open positions. The Shark Evoline has been constructed to weigh around a half of a pound or 200 grams. Its streamlined design effectively cuts buffeting and noise levels. This helmet is available on the market for about $450.                    Photo: Clinton Phillips

10. Schuberth SR1

Schuberth SR1The Schuberth SR1 helmet is both Dot and ECE approved. The aerodynamic design prevents uplift in accelerated speed and high winds. The duroplast matrix is created with a superior glass fiber reinforcement which includes a carbon layer thereby reducing the helmet’s overall weight. The A.R.O.S. is a safety feature of all Schuberth helmets which ensures the chinstrap is adjusted and secured properly. The Schuberth SR1 helmet features an aero acoustically designed wind deflector to improve noise levels. It is offered for around $900.

Photo: Schuberth


11. HJC CL-17


The HJC CL-17 creators used Computer Aided Design technology to construct this Polycarbonate Composite Shell to be lightweight. Its face shield offers riders a UV protection against 95% of rays. This helmet features an extremely secure, locking, RapidFire Shield Replacement System. An air deflector that is integrated into the helmet provides effective noise reduction. The HJC CL-17 is both Snell and DOT approved up to size 2X. Beyond that the helmets are only DOT certified. The helmet may be purchased for about $125.

Photo: Christian D’Antonio

Related posts


  • Ed in Miami
    April 10, 2013 at 8:35 pm

    Really, there is no evidence that these super premium helmets provide any better protection than the DOT full face helmets that you can get at Cycle Gear for $49.99. If there is, I would like to see it. Me, personally, I use a 2010 Bell Star, but that is because of comfort and features, not because I think it provides more protection than other Snell approved helmets costing hundreds less.

    • PismoJoe
      April 10, 2013 at 11:26 pm

      It sounds legit to me, if you think about it, those $50 plastic buckets with cheap liners cannot be near as safe as, an engineered for safety, high-end material that stands up to a much more rigorous set of standards. If the cheap helmet could pass those test they would do it and proudly announce it has same quality at a fraction of the cost.

      • Biostar01
        March 28, 2014 at 4:20 am

        Well, it’s not exactly styrofoam, and that’s for a reason. There is a HUGE difference between styrofoam and the EPS foam used in helmets. Your suggestion of gel has a slight issue with the gel technology available right now. Most ‘soft, cushiony’ gels will not absorb enough energy to protect you in a 50mph crash. Recently, we have seen technologies such as D3O that can absorb more energy, and some helmets utilize these gels as intermediate layers between solid crash protection – EPS polystyrene. Styrofoam crumbles between your fingers; EPS can take a 50mph direct impact and protect your brain. Your logic is correct in saying that you want multiple density layers, because different densities of EPS foam absorb different amounts of energy. For example, a layer of EPS that is built to withstand a 50mph impact is going to feel awfully hard in a 20mph impact, and likewise, a layer of EPS for 20mph protection will be crushed in a 50mph impact. I have seen motorcyclists ride with bicycle helmets because ‘it’s good protection’, but the foam used in those is built for low-speed cushioning, not freeway-speed protection. Here is where many helmets, such as the ones above, excel in comparison to the $50 plebeian helmets suggested above. The helmets above may be a bit more expensive, but they have lots of technology (such as many layers of impact-absorbing material, great aerodynamics and appropriate ventilation to prevent hearing loss from 115dB wind, etc). While you might save a bit of money at the cashier when you buy the bargain helmet, you are putting your own life at risk.

    March 11, 2014 at 11:38 am

    I’m extremely impressed together with your writing talents and also as} with the layout in your weblog. Is this a paid subject matter or did you customize it your self? Either way stay up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to peer a great weblog like this one today..

  • Xchoppers
    March 21, 2015 at 7:28 pm

    The idea of not wearing a helmet being safe is so stupid you’d think no one would be dumb enough to suggest it. I think it should be a personal choice but there’s no way in hell I would ride without one. I had a helmet save my life (again) on January 25, 2015 when I hit gravel in a blind turn on a back country road when I went through a barbwire fence at 50+ MPH. I had a small hematoma on the front of my brain as well as swelling along the side of my head but fortunately all was back to normal in a few days. Without a helmet I would surely be dead. I was wearing a full face modular at the time.

Leave a comment